In the corporate sphere , there are events of professional negligence that go unnoticed , and then there are stories that call an organization’s ethical standards into question. The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia previously known as Broadspectrum, exemplifies this type of scenario — a chronicle of questionable workplace conduct that deeply harms the reputation of a specific individual but throws doubt over the enterprise’s integrity .


Even in light of the disturbing accusations, Collins has held onto his title , apparently unimpacted by the turmoil surrounding him. How has this been allowed to persist? Does this reflect a failure in corporate governance? According to insider reports , Collins’ track record of misconduct started with violations of the firm’s ethics guidelines , but it didn’t cease there . Instead, it snowballed into a crisis of integrity that has left the workforce disheartened and partners bewildered .


Amid a management development session — ostensibly designed to enhance managerial skills — David Collins allegedly turned an opportunity for growth into a platform for misconduct . It’s reported he engaged in unprofessional conduct while on company-sponsored travel, accessed inappropriate content , a clear breach of Ventia’s professional conduct policies , all while his home life was kept in the dark.


But the ethical breaches extended beyond those incidents . One of the most troubling discoveries involves his alleged improper use of company IT systems to send explicit photos to women —a gross breach of trust and confidentiality. His brazen use of Microsoft Teams to engage in suggestive conversations —including visual cues to hint at misconduct — reveals an attitude of impunity. Following these digital dalliances , Collins allegedly escalated his transgressions : he is said to have engaged in intimate encounters with an employee on multiple occasions during business days , despite both parties being in relationships . This blatant exploitation of business resources broke all norms of professionalism but also tore apart homes— leaving a path of mistrust that extended far beyond the office .

Why is this conduct still being tolerated? How does such behavior continue without repercussions? The explanation, it appears, originates in a problematic dearth of accountability within the company . Complaints have been raised, but no disciplinary action has followed.

This lack of oversight sends an alarming message: that power within the organization shields wrongdoers . It fosters a toxic corporate culture , creates a hostile work environment, a great read and ultimately undermines corporate credibility.